Supporters of Barack Obama and even the Obama campaign like to keep pointing out that Barack Obama is the next John F. Kennedy.  Is it because of the youth factor?  The promise of hope?  It certainly isn’t about policy.  Check it out:

JFK, on what needs to be done to rebuild the economy in a time of recession:

And now, Barack Obama, on how to run the economy:

If you’re interested in the full clip of Obama’s talk with “Joe the Plumber,” that can be found here.  This is where he talks about raising taxes on those making more than $250,000 per year so that the economy can be built from the bottom-up.  JFK would not have agreed with this policy.

For good measure, here is a video of Congressman Barney Frank, living up to his name and speaking VERY frankly, to give you more of an idea of what the Democrats, with full control of the Senate and the House, would like to do and would be able to do with Barack Obama in the White House:

Getting the picture?

So, if the ideas of Obama and the rest of the fiscal liberals in Congress don’t match the policies of JFK, whose ideas do they match?

From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need. ” – Karl Marx

Under capitalism, the free market has to be allowed to work. People and businesses have to be allowed to fail. Mother Government can’t come in and save the day by using taxpayer money to bail out people and businesses just because it hurts to see this failure. When businesses fail, a hole in the market is left behind. That hole will eventually be filled by some other business who is likely performing the same function and very well might even employ many of the same people who worked at the failed business.

I believe the same thing applies to failed mortgages. I hate that people are losing their homes, but that isn’t my fault and it isn’t your fault. We shouldn’t have to pay for the mortgages that couldn’t be covered by those who owned them.  Personal responsibility needs to be the theme of these times.  If there are consequences people must face as a result of their irresponsibility or ignorance, then they must be allowed to face them.

What will happen? Well, the market might struggle quite a bit (though, now it looks like that was going to happen with or without a bailout). Housing prices and values may drop significantly. But here’s the thing. They will likely drop to a rate to where average people can start buying homes again.

That, in my opinion, is where a lot of this got out of hand. Everything has been overinflated for so long that it has just been accepted that this how things are supposed to be. The market is down to below 9,000 for the first time in 4 or 5 years, and people are freaking out. What does this mean for the average person? Investments may be struggling a bit and that can hurt, but, otherwise, not a whole lot. Life will go on. And maybe with corrections in the market, life will become more affordable again.

But that likely won’t even be given a chance to work … at least not under the leadership of either of the two main presidential candidates.  They do not seem interested in allowing the free market to do its thing.

Even if this mortgage buyout WAS a good idea in theory, the federal government is one of the worst managed “businesses” in history. Do you really trust them to not bungle up a mortgage buyout? I guarantee that once all of those mortgages are bought up, we’ll just see some other huge mess as a result of it that will cost billions and billions more. Things NEVER run as smoothly as the government tells us they will.

As radio talk show host Phil Valentine always says, “The government should only do what the private sector cannot, will not, or should not do.” The federal government should protect us from foreign enemies and domestic violence. The government should not try to control the economy—at least not on the micromanagement level of owning and controlling businesses. The economy’s ups and downs should be a result of the free market being allowed to work.

But that’s just my opinion.

  • RSS Bible Gateway Verse of the Day

    • Matthew 16:25
      “For whoever wants to save their life will lose it, but whoever loses their life for me will find it.”
  • June 2017
    S M T W T F S
    « Nov    
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  
  • Archives

  • Categories

  • $700 billion 2008 election abortion antwaan randle el back pain bailout barack obama belmont belmont university bengals biden bush christian cincinnati congress conservative conservatives constitution party debate democrat democratic party Democrats election election '08 fantasy football football funny george bush homeless house jennifer brunner jesus joe biden john mccain karl marx liberal liberalism liberals marx mccain murder nashville neck pain news obama ohio pain palin paul politics president president bush radical republican republicans ron paul sarah palin second presidential debate secretary of state senate senators shoulder pain socialism socialist socialists spread the wealth state fair steve slaton stock market subprime mortgages supreme court tennessee third party candidates titans voter fraud
  • Recent Comments

    Levitigus on Do you approve of slavery? Wou…
    vino blanco on Biden’s Bloopers and Pra…
    Maura on Biden’s Bloopers and Pra…
    Tim on My thoughts after election…
    meggo on My thoughts after election…
  • Blog Stats

    • 8,168 hits
  • Meta